|
From: Ian P. <ian...@in...> - 2002-09-05 23:15:51
|
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Tim Rowledge wrote: > Oh, and Ian, you were wrong a couple of messages back - in general the > .changes file could do with living in a writable directory... Well, only because the image insists on opening it read-write. There's nothing fundamental preventing it from being read-only if the session is not intended to make any changes in the image. > limiting assumptions currently in the system. I suspect that it isn't > normally expected in unix that a text file would be in > /blah/bin/var/nobodyinparticular/usr/sqf/squeak/3.2/bin along with the > vm. Actually, this is precisely the situation we have when using the npsqueak browser plugin. > And from reading some of the discussion relating to ROX I get the > impression that where to put files can become a holywar for unixoids. Which is why it should all be kept as simple as possible. Ian |