|
From: <gor...@bl...> - 2002-08-21 10:09:24
|
(still including Gerardo and Lantz since they are not on this list) Eric Scharff wrote: > I apologize that I was not aware of the vouching scheme before receiving > this email. Thanks for the information. No apologize needed. :-) Essentially it was a suggestion from Andreas which IMHO sounded sane and there where no comments from the rest so I simply went ahead and tried to introduce it. It will probably NOT mean anyone needs to be removed, that was not the intention. The intention is to make sure we are all in agreement with the "soon to be in effect" policy and that we follow it. The port maintainers (and others like me) simply felt it was a good idea to try to do something in order to maintain "order in the class". Especially now when we are introducing branches and tags etc. :-) Essentially the vouch simply is there to ensure that people are aware of the policy and to make sure someone mops up the mess if something goes bad. And as long as people stick to the branches no harm is done if they mess up anyhow. Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > I did not really follow the thread and do not know why there is a debate > about removing people (instead of attracting more or leaving it as it is). > In fact I think this is an attempt to fix a nonexisting problem. > > Anyway, I probably will not be able to contribute to the VM sources during > the next months and therefore do not care much about beeing removed or not. We are not going to remove people - I am sure we will establish vouches for anyone already "in". But there HAS been a problem. Especially Andreas Raab and Ian Piumarta (I don't really know about Tim or John) have not felt that SF was working good - they where simply not "in the boat". After a long thread with a lot of constructive ideas from different people we actually (gasp!) agreed on a model. So I am pulling this along so that we will have a policy that seems sound and so that all port maintainers are "in the boat together". I think we have that now - it's simply up to me to finish the darn swikipages so that we can all dig in and we also need to get all these vouches placed so that the vouching model can be considered "active". My guess (ONLY a guess) is for example that Ian will begin go through the code at SF, pick out the cherries, integrate them in his own current sources and then do a full replace at SF with what he has. His code has evolved a LOT lately so this will be a very good thing for the Unix port. Anyway, Eric has acknowledged that he has read through the Swiki pages I have written so far and I am placing my trust vouch on him. Basically it all boils down to this: DON'T MESS WITH THE TRUNK & KEEP THOSE TAGNAMES ACCORDING TO CONVENTION. Everything else is forgivable. :-) And also - everything is fixable. :-) Current list of non vouched: Andreas Kuckartz Gerardo Richarte Jörn Eyrich Lantz Rowland Stephan Rudlof regards, Göran |