RE: [Squeak-VMdev] Re: [SqueakSF] SqeakSF Policy Proposal [was: Re: [VM 3.2-4] build problems, if an acinclude.m4 has been added]

[Andreas R. <And...@gm...>]

> This is a teeny, trivial little point but w.r.t. tags I would 
> probably use "stable-unix-3.2-2" (note the 3.2-2 rather than 3-2-2)
> to keep tag names consistent with everything else (rpms, in
particular). 
> Unless CVS has problems with "." in tags??

Oh, c'mon Ian, do you *really* think I would've used the dashes unless
absolutely necessary?! ;-)

[Oh, and by the way, you're not coming to Apple Hill by any chance do
you?!]

Cheers,
  - Andreas