[Squeak-VMdev] Re: [SqueakSF] SqeakSF Policy Proposal [was: Re: [VM 3.2-4] build problems, if an acinclude.m4 has been added]

[Ian P. <ian...@in...>]

On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 gor...@bl... wrote:

> I am revisiting the Swiki pages I wrote that begin at:
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2512
> 
> If you haven't read them - PLEASE DO SO and respond on this list.

I've read over them and what's there so dat looks entirely reasonable.  
(I will wait to see what results from some initial "cooking" of the raw
"brain-dumps" at the bottom of the pages before offering comments, if any,
on that material.)

This is a teeny, trivial little point but w.r.t. tags I would probably use
"stable-unix-3.2-2" (note the 3.2-2 rather than 3-2-2) to keep tag names
consistent with everything else (rpms, in particular).  Unless CVS has
problems with "." in tags??

*If* I run out of foreground work in the next couple of days I may go
digging in there (the brain-dumps in particular) much more deeply.

Regards,

Ian