RE: [Squeak-VMdev] RE: Pending 3.2 and VM sources @ sourceforge

[Andreas R. <And...@gm...>]

Ian,

I think this would be great. My major concern is mostly making errors so
I wouldn't even require this to be "secure" in any way. What it should
do is to make it harder to do stupid mistakes and for that it seems
perfectly applicable.

Cheers,
  - Andreas


> -----Original Message-----
> From: squ...@li... 
> [mailto:squ...@li...] On Behalf 
> Of Ian Piumarta
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:44 PM
> To: Rob Withers
> Cc: squ...@li...
> Subject: RE: [Squeak-VMdev] RE: Pending 3.2 and VM sources @ 
> sourceforge
> 
> 
> On Mon, 13 May 2002, Rob Withers wrote:
> > 
> > Do we know that we can restrict access to the main trunk to the
> > maintainers, then issue expanded rights to select 
> individuals to their
> > branches?
> 
> You can do it with a trivial commitinfo script to filter the usernames
> that are allowed to commit to a particular area.  (The script 
> is called on
> every commit with env vars and arguments telling who, what, 
> where, etc.  
> If the script exits with nonzero then the commit is aborted.  
> A few lines
> of case/sed/test/etc. does the trick.)
> 
> Of course, for this to be in any way secure, SF must only 
> allow admins to
> meddle with the contents of CVSROOT/commitinfo.
> 
> Ciao,
> Ian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________
> 
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Squeak-VMdev mailing list
> Squ...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squeak-vmdev
>