RE: [Squeak-VMdev] RE: Pending 3.2 and VM sources @ sourceforge

[<gor...@bl...>]

"Andreas Raab" <And...@gm...> wrote:
> Rob,
> 
> > Do we know that we can restrict access to the main trunk to the
> > maintainers, then issue expanded rights to select individuals to their
> > branches?  The original model we had discussed was that the main trunk
> > was the most volitile, and both experimental work and stable releases
> > (and it's patches) are managed as branches.
> > 
> > What are the user access controls available to us from SF?
> 
> None as far as I know. If you have developer status you have commit
> rights anywhere (I think they've never anticipated that kind of strict
> distinction that we're discussing here - perhaps it might be worthwhile
> to send them a note explaining why we think along these lines).

Well, I would guess SF just uses CVS more or less off the shelf but
anyway, this might help:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/cvssupport/ 

According to some postings on Usenet it includes ACL functionality.

regards, Göran