RE: [Squeak-VMdev] RE: Pending 3.2 and VM sources @ sourceforge

[Rob W. <rwi...@at...>]

"Andreas Raab" <And...@gm...> wrote:
> Let's see if I got you right: You are basically proposing that there's a
> main trunk in the repository which is guarded by the maintainer of the
> port. Everyone else having commit permissions can happily hack away on
> his or her branch. Merging works by a variety of models depending on
> who's got what amount of time. Correct?!

Do we know that we can restrict access to the main trunk to the
maintainers, then issue expanded rights to select individuals to their
branches?  The original model we had discussed was that the main trunk
was the most volitile, and both experimental work and stable releases
(and it's patches) are managed as branches.  

What are the user access controls available to us from SF?

> 
> There are a few points about this that I'm a bit unhappy with. One is
> that it appears to me that working on a branch may be complicated. 

I have forgotten the commands to tag the trunk, then branch (with a
branch tag).  It really isn't that difficult once we know these
commands.

Rob