From: Phillip L. <ph...@sq...> - 2023-11-17 02:17:56
|
On 16/11/2023 21:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:13:52 +0800 Lizhi Xu <liz...@wi...> wrote: > >> when the length passed in is 0, the subsequent process should be exited. > > Thanks, but when fixing a bug, please always describe the runtime > effects of that bug. Amongst other things, other people need this > information to be able to decide which kernel versions need patching. > >> Reported-by: syz...@sy... > > Which is a reason why we're now adding the "Closes:" tag after > Reported-by:. Which is also one reason why you should always run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch. This alerted me to the need for a "Closes:" tag after Reported-by: on the last patch I sent. > > I googled the sysbot email address and so added > > Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/000...@go... > > to the changelog. Thanks. That is indeed the sysbot issue that the patch fixes. > > I'll assume that a -stable kernel backport is needed. > > Yes. Phillip |