Re: [Sqlrelay-discussion] Listener patch

[Renat S. <sr...@st...>]

On 28.06.2011 20:54, David Muse wrote:
> This patch looks good.  I applied it.  Also, just for good measure, I 
> added code to handle the other semaphore failures in the same method 
> in the same way.
>
> I don't think waiting on sem(2) is an issue though, if a connection is 
> immediately available, then the listener will just hand off to it, 
> otherwise, it will fork a child to wait on sem(2) while it loops back 
> to handle more client connections.
I agree. It was my fault with the test system configuration. Clients 
were connected through apache+php limited to max 5 workers. New requests 
simply did not reach main sqlrelay listener and it could not start new 
connection. Thanks for your analysis.