sqlobject-discuss

[SQLObject] Using a persistant connection

[Nick <ni...@dd...>]

If I want to keep a persistant db connection but not cache, I can see
how I can do this by saying:

class._connection.cache = CacheSet()

but I'm not sure if mucking with the internals like that is the right
way to go.  Is there some other way to handle this that I'm not seeing? 
If not, should there be?

Nick

Re: [SQLObject] Using a persistant connection

[Luke O. <lu...@me...>]

_connection = WhateverConnection(...., cacheValues=False)

is that all you're looking for? Maybe i misread your question.

- Luke

Quoting Nick <ni...@dd...>:

> If I want to keep a persistant db connection but not cache, I can
> see
> how I can do this by saying:
>
> class._connection.cache = CacheSet()
>
> but I'm not sure if mucking with the internals like that is the
> right
> way to go.  Is there some other way to handle this that I'm not
> seeing?
> If not, should there be?
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> sqlobject-discuss mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
>


--
 i find your contempt for naked feet curious.

Re: [SQLObject] Using a persistant connection

[Nick <ni...@dd...>]

On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 12:08, Luke Opperman wrote:
> _connection = WhateverConnection(...., cacheValues=False)
> 
> is that all you're looking for? Maybe i misread your question.

No... I *do* want to cache objects for a particular session, but between
sessions I want a new cache.

Nick

Re: [SQLObject] Using a persistant connection

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 10:44, Nick wrote:
> If I want to keep a persistant db connection but not cache, I can see
> how I can do this by saying:
> 
> class._connection.cache = CacheSet()
> 
> but I'm not sure if mucking with the internals like that is the right
> way to go.  Is there some other way to handle this that I'm not seeing? 
> If not, should there be?

Caches should be stored entirely per-connection, including
per-transaction (which works by using a separate connection).  This
happens in SQLObject.py:315 -- see if that's what you're thinking of.

  Ian