sqlobject-discuss

[SQLObject] sqlite support without patch

[Frank B. <fb...@fo...>]

Hallo,

I wasn't too happy with the need to patch SQLObject for sqlite
support, and there was a small API-change regarding type information
in pysqlite 0.4, while my patch still used 0.3. So I now made
SQLiteConnection standalone as attached. The patching of SQLObject.py
is gone, too. 

Also 'id' isn't hardcoded anymore, because I discovered pysqlite's
DBAPI-extension "lastrowid".

I suspect, that SQLiteConnection now is really useable.  

ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                               _ ______footils.org__

Re: [SQLObject] sqlite support without patch

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

Cool -- I've added it to CVS in DBConnection.  I can't build the sqlite
Python module, so I haven't tested it, but it looks straight-forward.

On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 04:50, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> 
> I wasn't too happy with the need to patch SQLObject for sqlite
> support, and there was a small API-change regarding type information
> in pysqlite 0.4, while my patch still used 0.3. So I now made
> SQLiteConnection standalone as attached. The patching of SQLObject.py
> is gone, too. 
> 
> Also 'id' isn't hardcoded anymore, because I discovered pysqlite's
> DBAPI-extension "lastrowid".
> 
> I suspect, that SQLiteConnection now is really useable.  
> 
> ciao

Re: [SQLObject] sqlite support without patch

[Frank B. <fb...@fo...>]

Hallo,
Ian Bicking hat gesagt: // Ian Bicking wrote:

> Cool -- I've added it to CVS in DBConnection.  I can't build the sqlite
> Python module, so I haven't tested it, but it looks straight-forward.

Cool++.

Do you have an idea, why I'm always getting "p is not p2" in people.py
regardless of the backend I'm using? And is this important?

ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                               _ ______footils.org__

Re: [SQLObject] sqlite support without patch

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 07:13, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Do you have an idea, why I'm always getting "p is not p2" in people.py
> regardless of the backend I'm using? And is this important?

I've been busy with a paper, but this should be fixed now.  Uniqueness
like that is depended on for much of the caching, so it's important that
it does work (at least if you use caching).

  Ian

Re: [SQLObject] sqlite support without patch

[Frank B. <fb...@fo...>]

Hallo,
Ian Bicking hat gesagt: // Ian Bicking wrote:

> Cool -- I've added it to CVS in DBConnection.  I can't build the sqlite
> Python module, so I haven't tested it, but it looks straight-forward.

Ahm: Cool-- ;(

Did you forget the commit? At least I'm not seeing the sqlite-support
in my last checkout. Or do I need to get a specific branch?

ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                               _ ______footils.org__

Re: [SQLObject] sqlite support without patch

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 08:30, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Did you forget the commit? At least I'm not seeing the sqlite-support
> in my last checkout. Or do I need to get a specific branch?

Sigh... yes I did.  I'll bang my head on the wall a few times, and maybe
next time I'll remember to commit.

  Ian