Author: phd
Date: 2009-07-25 05:05:09 -0600 (Sat, 25 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 3927
Removed:
SQLObject/branches/0.9/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt
Modified:
SQLObject/branches/0.9/docs/rebuild
Log:
Removed SQLObject.comments.txt.
Deleted: SQLObject/branches/0.9/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt
===================================================================
--- SQLObject/branches/0.9/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt 2009-07-25 11:01:07 UTC (rev 3926)
+++ SQLObject/branches/0.9/docs/SQLObject.comments.txt 2009-07-25 11:05:09 UTC (rev 3927)
@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
-==== $(left-join-and-other-joins) c ++
-----------------------------------------
-date: 2005-12-07T08:36:44
-email: mk...@em...
-id: 3
-ip: 208.255.226.178
-username: Mike Kent
-
-It's probably just me, but I'm finding this part quite confusing. You'd use a left join to join two tables together, but this example refers to THREE tables, MyTable, Table1, and Table2. I haven't been able to grasp what's going on.
-==== $(one-to-many-relationships) c ++++
-----------------------------------------
-date: 2005-12-07T08:46:22
-email: mk...@em...
-id: 4
-ip: 208.255.226.178
-username: Mike Kent
-
-If I have this correctly: For a one-to-many relationship, you use 'ForeignKey' on the 'has one' side, and you use 'MultipleJoin' on the 'has many' side. I found this to be incredibly non-intuitive and confusing. How about 'hasOneOf' and 'hasManyOf'? Or would this cause a problem with a many-to-many relationship, since both sides would use 'hasManyOf'?
-==== $(col-class-specifying-columns) c ++ c +++++ c
-----------------------------------------
-date: 2005-12-07T08:52:14
-email: mk...@em...
-id: 5
-ip: 208.255.226.178
-username: Mike Kent
-
-So if you declare a column as an alternateID, unique is implied, and we don't need to explicitly declare it?shouldn't this be protected???
-==== $(orderby) +
-----------------------------------------
-date: 2005-12-08T10:47:35
-email: ch...@wo...
-id: 9
-ip: 134.84.144.61
-username: Chad Walstrom
-
-Text turned grey here. This renders the text in the following Note unreadable unless you mouse-over.
-==== $(selecting-multiple-objects)
-----------------------------------------
-date: 2006-01-04T14:47:33
-email: jw...@jw...
-id: 10
-ip: 128.197.24.59
-username: Joe
-
-Think about breaking these SELECT statements onto several lines. They're busting out of the page design now.
-==== $(col-class-specifying-columns) c ++ c +++++ c +
-----------------------------------------
-date: 2006-02-02T15:43:28
-email: Man
-id: 11
-ip: 192.100.104.28
-username: Big
-
-StringCol's that are alternateID's must have a length property if you use them in MySQL.
-==== $(relatedjoin-many-to-many) c ++++
-----------------------------------------
-date: 2006-05-18T14:17:19
-email: we...@or...
-id: 12
-ip: 209.204.147.64
-username: Jonathan Wellons
-
-What is the advantage over traditional relations?
Modified: SQLObject/branches/0.9/docs/rebuild
===================================================================
--- SQLObject/branches/0.9/docs/rebuild 2009-07-25 11:01:07 UTC (rev 3926)
+++ SQLObject/branches/0.9/docs/rebuild 2009-07-25 11:05:09 UTC (rev 3927)
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
export PYTHONPATH=$parent:$PYTHONPATH
NORMAL="Authors DeveloperGuide FAQ Inheritance News
- SQLBuilder SQLObject SQLObject.comments TODO Versioning
- community download index links sqlobject-admin sqlobject-architecture"
+ SQLBuilder SQLObject TODO Versioning community download index
+ links sqlobject-admin sqlobject-architecture"
for NAME in $NORMAL ; do
if [ -e "$NAME.html" -a ! "$NAME.html" -ot "$NAME.txt" ] ; then
|
