Re: [SQLObject] Re: Memory leak?

[Martin d'A. <Mar...@s2...>]

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Justin Azoff wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 18:25, Ryan Harper wrote:
> > It seems to me the best way to preserve SQLObject behavior without
> > introducing a new toggle ( as I previously suggested ) would be to (as
> > you suggest) fill out selectResults without issuing a select to
> > the database.  
> > 
> > Unless someone sees a reason why SQLObject SHOULD or MUST query the
> > database rather than using the values that were passed to the table I
> > think that would be a good optimization with no interface impact.
> > 
> > Ryan Harper

I can see one reason, but I am not sure it is true: what if you need to 
immediately use an auto_increment value in a subsequent insert for a 
one/many-to-many relationship?

Martin