Re: [SQLObject] Unexpected Behavior

[Andrew B. <and...@pu...>]

On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:25:40PM -0400, Todd Boland wrote:
> In the following class definition, I would expect 
> organization.phone_numbers to contain the phone numbers associated with 
> the organization. However, they are defined in 
> organizaiton.phoneNumbers instead.  I explicitly stated I wanted them 
> in organization.phone_numbers. Why bother assigning RelatedJoins in the 
> examples if the member the coder assigns is irrelevant?

Have you tried the latest SQLObject from SVN?  This looks to me like a bug
that was fixed recently.

-Andrew.