Re: [SQLObject] Alternate Sequence Name

[Ivo v. d. W. <vla...@gm...>]

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:22:29 +0000 (UTC), Carroll Kong
<me...@ca...> wrote:
> 
> Using Postgresql with SQLObject (svn updated a few days ago, shouldn't matter in
> this case anyway)
> 
> I created a "writeable" view (using rules).  However because the viewname is
> different than the actual primary key, then my inserts fail
> 

I ran into exactly the same problem when experimenting with views, and
I ran into it recently again when I wanted to use a global sequence to
get unique id's across tables (don't ask why :)

I'd like a feature like this. It should probably part of the id column
definition, which is not present at this moment (why can't id columns
be defined explicitly?)

Cheers

Ivo