Re: [SQLObject] Optional One to One Relationships

[alexander s. <al...@an...>]

CLIFFORD ILKAY wrote, at 17.06.2004 14:27:

> How would you represent an optional one to one relationship with 
> SQLObject? A use case would be a system where there is a table for 
> person and another for donor. A person can be a donor but need not be a 
> donor. If a person becomes a donor, there must not be more than one 
> donor row. Donations are handled in another table.

we use inheritance patch by Daniel Savard for that.

see 
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3802832&forum_id=30269

best wishes,
alex.