RE: [SQLObject] proxy attributes

[<jws...@ra...>]

>> Note that from the standpoint of the cust_account object, these are all
>> one-to-one relations.

>if the relations are strict one-to-one, then why data is divided into 
>separate tables?

They are actually many-to-one, but from this side of the join it looks like
a one-to-one. This customer account has that one buyer. From the buyer side
of the join, that one buyer has many potential customer accounts.

>perhaps relationships may be optional, e.g. some customers are buyers, 
>and others are not?  if this is the case, then you may consider using 
>SQLObject inheritance patch by Daniel Savard.

No, customers = accounts and buyers = people. Inheritance is one way of 
looking at it, though. I will investigate that.