From: John B. <jb...@te...> - 2003-11-11 16:55:20
|
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 16:49, Luke Opperman wrote: > I don't really need to fuel this argument, I happen to be in the "Discussion". > "relational calculus is able to represent all my data" camp (Yes, CJ Date > writes my nighttime prayers :) But there's no reason why we need to agree > on this, from what's been discussed so far as functionality for SQLObject, > go for it. If only I was that 3l13t3 at Python ;-) > Just need to realize, those of us who are using SQLObject as a "mapping > from rtables to objects, not objects to tables" aren't going to be on the It can do both! But you (the people who own the project) need to decide which side of the wall to sit on. If you're going to go the superset way, then it needs to be thought of now rather than later. Perhaps looking over www.objectmatter.com would benefit a few. That does both mapping from tables to Java objects, and vice versa. John -- John Baker, Senior Developer, TEAM. http://www.teamenergy.com Views expressed in this mail are my own. |