Re: [SQLObject] (no subject) Really: Transaction problem

[Randall R. <ra...@ra...>]

On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 12:26 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:

> On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 11:04 AM, Randall Randall wrote:
>> On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 11:36 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
>>
>>> Oops... I think that was a bug, fixed in CVS.  I should probably 
>>> roll a new version from the current CVS, actually.
>>
>> Does that mean I should just use the CVS code?  Is
>> it considered stable enough to use for production?
>
> Well, most of the changes since the last release have been bug fixes 
> and features that shouldn't effect stability (Sybase support, for 
> example).  So I think it's better to use CVS.

Okay, thanks!

-- 
Randall Randall <ra...@ra...>
"You assist an evil system most effectively by obeying its orders and 
decrees." -- Mahatma Gandhi