Re: [SQLObject] Passthrough pure SQL?

[Edmund L. <el...@in...>]

Ian Bicking wrote:

> Yes, the connections have a query(sql) method, with no return value. 
> There's also an attribute conn, which is the actual connection object. 
> So long as you aren't using cacheValues, or you aren't modifying rows
> that could have instantiated SQLObject instances, it shouldn't be a
> problem.

This would be tricky... I thought that just invalidating the cache would 
do the trick, but what if the cache contains uncommitted changes? 
Hmmm... in the case of absolutely new objects, this won't be an issue 
but I think monkeying with data that might already be in the cache is 
problematic.

...Edmund.