Re: [SQLObject] RelatedJoin bug

[Nick <ni...@dd...>]

Edmund Lian wrote:
> However, I suppose the biggest reason for wanting to keep more than one 
> related join in a table is to allow for easy querying.

It's not uncommon to have 3 (but far less common to have more than that) 
related columns in a single table.  It'll happen in 4th normal form, and 
there *is* somewhat of a convenience factor, depending on what it is you're 
relating.

Nick