Re: [SQLObject] Re: Impressions so far

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 03:55, Edmund Lian wrote:
> Bud P.Bruegger wrote:
> 
> > * Looking at other ORMs, I think we can't give enough credit to Ian
> >   for having found a way of doing things EASY and intuitive.  Some of
> >   that stuff looks to complex and verbose that it would be great for
> >   Enterprise Java...  Thanks, Ian!  One really starts to appreciate
> >   this more and more when one looks at alternatives  (which I haven't
> >   done much before..)
> 
> Yes, I do agree... I'm exercising SQLObject (and myself) quite a bit, 
> and it is proving to be very pleasant to use. Thank you Ian!

Thanks, I'm glad you both like SQLObject.

> I've been making a lot of comments, not because I'm complaining, but 
> because I think SQLObject has a good chance at being the best Python ORM 
>   out there. I find that Ian's philosophy and desire for clean 
> interfaces (e.g., the choice to use attribute style access for column 
> data) to be dead-on.

I don't mind comments at all -- thinking back on them, I don't actually
take a whole lot of the suggestions that are given, but in the end I at
least have a better idea of why I'm doing one thing and not the other,
even if at the root it's mostly based on intuition.  Either way it just
brings me one step closer to WORLD DOMINATION!

  Ian