Re: [SQLObject] Col naming in MultipleJoin

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

On Sat, 2003-05-10 at 13:40, Luke Opperman wrote:
> My question is: what would you prefer the initialization for
> foreignKey's be? I'll throw out my idea, which is based on the fact
> that in general, we specify the *python* attribute name as the column
> name, and the dbName is optional:
> 
>   ForeignCol('person', foreignKey='Person')
> 
> would assume (based on Style object?) the dbname is person_id, and the
> direct ID python access stays as "personID" (since I think there are
> cases where there's justification for retaining immediate access to
> the actual key values).

I intended to do something like this.  Or maybe just:

KeyCol('Person')

Both person and personID then being implied.  I'm not sure whether I
should just replace KeyCol, or create a ForeignKey or ForeignCol class. 
I created a ForeignKey class in CVS, at least for now.

  Ian