Re: [SQLObject] naming conventions

[Bud P. B. <bu...@si...>]

That would probably be consistent.  I wasn't disturbed by the name
earlier because DateTime could as well refer to the mx.DateTime type
of python that is stored as the (non-standard) MySQL DateTime data
type...

--b

On 30 Apr 2003 11:53:28 -0500
Nick <ni...@dd...> wrote:

> Okay, correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't the ANSI standard for
> storing ISO dates in a database using a TIMESTAMP type?  I'm pretty sure
> it is... so why is the column type in SQLObject DateTimeCol instead of
> TimestampCol?  I realize that each database backend uses its own type,
> but shouldn't SQLObject's naming stick to the standards?
> 
> Hoping not to start a db holy war,
> Nick
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> sqlobject-discuss mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
> 


/-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Bud P. Bruegger, Ph.D. 
| Sistema (www.sistema.it)
| Via U. Bassi, 54
| 58100 Grosseto, Italy
| +39-0564-411682 (voice and fax)
\-----------------------------------------------------------------