Re: [SQLObject] Temporary Objects

[Ian B. <ia...@co...>]

On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 11:53, Brad Bollenbach wrote:
> > That seems confusing to me.  If you're going to use database
> > transactions, why not just use them entirely?  You only seem to really
> > gain something if you can avoid them entirely (and thus make it possible
> > to add transactions to lesser databases).
> 
> To be useable with database backends that don't support transactions
> natively, and to provide a consistent interface for using them either
> way.

If we can create in-Python transactions, that'd be great... but if we
create something that's in Python, but still depends on database
transactions (and so isn't usable from MySQL), then I'm not clear what
the advantage is.

  Ian