Re: [SQLObject] two beginner's questions

[Nick <ni...@dd...>]

On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 23:33, Luke Opperman wrote:
> class AbstractObject(SQLObject):
>     _columns = StringCol('lang')
> 
> class Z(AbstractObject):
>     _columns = AbstractObject._columns + [StringCol('nother')]
> 
> class Y(AbstractObject):
>     _columns = AbstractObject._columns + [StringCol('further')]
> 
> And all of this actually seems to work in SQLObject 0.3, tested using
> DBMConnection. Wow. What do you say to that, Nick? :)

Okay, well that's cool :)  I've been working with classic objects for so
long (since '97) that I'm still trying to get a handle on the new style
classes.  SQLObject is really complex in that area, and I'm still trying
to grok it all (I've only been looking at it for about 3 days tho). 
Hopefully I can get up to speed soon to be able to contribute something
useful :)

Nick