Re: [SQLObject] TextCol

[Bud P. B. <bu...@si...>]

On 18 Apr 2003 20:09:19 -0500
Ian Bicking <ia...@co...> wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 15:58, Luke Opperman wrote:
> > For those who like things more explicit, I was asked to create a
> > forced TextCol (instead of letting StringCol handle both cases).
> 
> I can't decide... use SQL terminology (like TEXT), or Python terminology
> (like string)... for instance: notNull, notNone, or required?  One
> string column with multiple SQL implementations (CHAR, VARCHAR, and
> TEXT)?  And Python's strings can also be BLOBs... and XMLRPC needs
> Binary types to distinguish... and someday Python is supposed to
> distinguish between text and binary data...

On the philosphy of naming:  After proposing notNone instead of
NotNull to avoid SQL terminology, I've changed my mind and believe it
is ok to use full SQL terminology in the _column definition.  After
all, this is to decide about a physical representation in the backend.
As Ian points out, totally automatic mappings are not always optimal.  

This leaves the question on whether non-SQL backends, such as DBM or
potentially MetaKit can live with the SQL-specific
terminology/concepts...  

--b


> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> sqlobject-discuss mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
> 


/-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Bud P. Bruegger, Ph.D. 
| Sistema (www.sistema.it)
| Via U. Bassi, 54
| 58100 Grosseto, Italy
| +39-0564-411682 (voice and fax)
\-----------------------------------------------------------------