On 10 Apr 2003 13:26:27 -0500
Ian Bicking <ia...@co...> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 12:14, Bud P.Bruegger wrote:
> > Maybe, it would be possible to add yet another subclass to Col that
> > has an "sqlType" keyword attribute and simply passes on what is
> > written there to the DBMS. This would allow to take advantage of
> > "advanced" types that some DBMS provide.
>
> If your class has a sqlRepr() method, then that will be called to get
> the SQL representation. I should name that __sql_repr__ or something,
> though...
>
> Anyway, that's the hook you want.
>
> Ian
great! I'll have to look into this more closely...
thanks
--b
|