Re: [SQLObject] transactions

[M. D. <md...@em...>]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:31:37PM +0400, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:05:56PM +0200, M. Dietrich wrote:
> > how are thinks going on regarding transactions?
> 
>    What do you mean?
> 

the doc states

	Better transaction support -- right now you can use transactions for
	the database, but the object isn't transaction-aware, so non-database
	persistence won't be able to be rolled back.

i would like to see some kind of merge _lazyUpdate, no auto-commit and
caching and no further need for syncUpdate when commit is used. 

someone else wrote a posting regarding caching and threading. this
also involves transactions.


best regards,
	michael