Thread: [sqlmap-users] 113 tables on database

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

hi guys

is there a way to resume tables injection

i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
how do i start from 105 to 113 tables

thanks

In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is erased
and overwritten).

Bye

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...>
wrote:

> hi guys
>
> is there a way to resume tables injection
>
> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>
> thanks
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> sqlmap-users mailing list
> sql...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>

-- 
Miroslav Stampar
http://about.me/stamparm

Hi, miro thanks for the reply

Actually I already have 105 tables name crack so I use it in common tables.
I'm try to run a sqlmap with - - common tables

So far it works a sqlmap successfully brute force all the 105 table names
But when I try to resume it with --tables it start from 1 again

I just thought that if a sqlmap can do start and stop for data extraction
why not table names
On Sep 27, 2015 9:01 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
wrote:

> In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is erased
> and overwritten).
>
> Bye
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
>> hi guys
>>
>> is there a way to resume tables injection
>>
>> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
>> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> sqlmap-users mailing list
>> sql...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Miroslav Stampar
> http://about.me/stamparm
>

Hi.

You haven't told which SQLi technique has been identified by sqlmap (e.g.
boolean-based blind). Also, has sqlmap extracted those table names by
common table name search or by regular querying of the system tables (you
could remember this from first sqlmap's run).

If you are combining --common-tables with regular --tables, especially if
the sqlmap uses regular querying of system tables, this won't work. Thing
is that sqlmap doesn't know what is the "first table in database", nor
"second table in database", nor... All those tables are the same when
querying from system tables. Also, there can't be one huge "...WHERE
table_name NOT IN ('...','...'...)" as your request would most probably be
dropped by the web server (due to its HUGE length).

Bye

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...>
wrote:

> Hi, miro thanks for the reply
>
> Actually I already have 105 tables name crack so I use it in common tables.
> I'm try to run a sqlmap with - - common tables
>
> So far it works a sqlmap successfully brute force all the 105 table names
> But when I try to resume it with --tables it start from 1 again
>
> I just thought that if a sqlmap can do start and stop for data extraction
> why not table names
> On Sep 27, 2015 9:01 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
>> In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is erased
>> and overwritten).
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> hi guys
>>>
>>> is there a way to resume tables injection
>>>
>>> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
>>> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sqlmap-users mailing list
>>> sql...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Miroslav Stampar
>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>
>

-- 
Miroslav Stampar
http://about.me/stamparm

Hi miro

Owh i see..
Ok thanks for the reply

I'm using time based injection so you can imagine how long it takes for me
to do 113 tables from the start instead of resuming from 105

Thanks again
On Sep 28, 2015 2:45 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
wrote:

> Hi.
>
> You haven't told which SQLi technique has been identified by sqlmap (e.g.
> boolean-based blind). Also, has sqlmap extracted those table names by
> common table name search or by regular querying of the system tables (you
> could remember this from first sqlmap's run).
>
> If you are combining --common-tables with regular --tables, especially if
> the sqlmap uses regular querying of system tables, this won't work. Thing
> is that sqlmap doesn't know what is the "first table in database", nor
> "second table in database", nor... All those tables are the same when
> querying from system tables. Also, there can't be one huge "...WHERE
> table_name NOT IN ('...','...'...)" as your request would most probably be
> dropped by the web server (due to its HUGE length).
>
> Bye
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, miro thanks for the reply
>>
>> Actually I already have 105 tables name crack so I use it in common
>> tables.
>> I'm try to run a sqlmap with - - common tables
>>
>> So far it works a sqlmap successfully brute force all the 105 table names
>> But when I try to resume it with --tables it start from 1 again
>>
>> I just thought that if a sqlmap can do start and stop for data extraction
>> why not table names
>> On Sep 27, 2015 9:01 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is
>>> erased and overwritten).
>>>
>>> Bye
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi guys
>>>>
>>>> is there a way to resume tables injection
>>>>
>>>> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
>>>> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sqlmap-users mailing list
>>>> sql...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Miroslav Stampar
> http://about.me/stamparm
>

Which DBMS?

Bye

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...>
wrote:

> Hi miro
>
> Owh i see..
> Ok thanks for the reply
>
> I'm using time based injection so you can imagine how long it takes for me
> to do 113 tables from the start instead of resuming from 105
>
> Thanks again
> On Sep 28, 2015 2:45 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> You haven't told which SQLi technique has been identified by sqlmap (e.g.
>> boolean-based blind). Also, has sqlmap extracted those table names by
>> common table name search or by regular querying of the system tables (you
>> could remember this from first sqlmap's run).
>>
>> If you are combining --common-tables with regular --tables, especially if
>> the sqlmap uses regular querying of system tables, this won't work. Thing
>> is that sqlmap doesn't know what is the "first table in database", nor
>> "second table in database", nor... All those tables are the same when
>> querying from system tables. Also, there can't be one huge "...WHERE
>> table_name NOT IN ('...','...'...)" as your request would most probably be
>> dropped by the web server (due to its HUGE length).
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, miro thanks for the reply
>>>
>>> Actually I already have 105 tables name crack so I use it in common
>>> tables.
>>> I'm try to run a sqlmap with - - common tables
>>>
>>> So far it works a sqlmap successfully brute force all the 105 table
>>> names
>>> But when I try to resume it with --tables it start from 1 again
>>>
>>> I just thought that if a sqlmap can do start and stop for data
>>> extraction why not table names
>>> On Sep 27, 2015 9:01 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is
>>>> erased and overwritten).
>>>>
>>>> Bye
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi guys
>>>>>
>>>>> is there a way to resume tables injection
>>>>>
>>>>> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
>>>>> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sqlmap-users mailing list
>>>>> sql...@li...
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Miroslav Stampar
>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>
>

-- 
Miroslav Stampar
http://about.me/stamparm

Mysql
On Sep 28, 2015 3:18 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
wrote:

> Which DBMS?
>
> Bye
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi miro
>>
>> Owh i see..
>> Ok thanks for the reply
>>
>> I'm using time based injection so you can imagine how long it takes for
>> me to do 113 tables from the start instead of resuming from 105
>>
>> Thanks again
>> On Sep 28, 2015 2:45 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> You haven't told which SQLi technique has been identified by sqlmap
>>> (e.g. boolean-based blind). Also, has sqlmap extracted those table names by
>>> common table name search or by regular querying of the system tables (you
>>> could remember this from first sqlmap's run).
>>>
>>> If you are combining --common-tables with regular --tables, especially
>>> if the sqlmap uses regular querying of system tables, this won't work.
>>> Thing is that sqlmap doesn't know what is the "first table in database",
>>> nor "second table in database", nor... All those tables are the same when
>>> querying from system tables. Also, there can't be one huge "...WHERE
>>> table_name NOT IN ('...','...'...)" as your request would most probably be
>>> dropped by the web server (due to its HUGE length).
>>>
>>> Bye
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, miro thanks for the reply
>>>>
>>>> Actually I already have 105 tables name crack so I use it in common
>>>> tables.
>>>> I'm try to run a sqlmap with - - common tables
>>>>
>>>> So far it works a sqlmap successfully brute force all the 105 table
>>>> names
>>>> But when I try to resume it with --tables it start from 1 again
>>>>
>>>> I just thought that if a sqlmap can do start and stop for data
>>>> extraction why not table names
>>>> On Sep 27, 2015 9:01 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is
>>>>> erased and overwritten).
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> hi guys
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is there a way to resume tables injection
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
>>>>>> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> sqlmap-users mailing list
>>>>>> sql...@li...
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Miroslav Stampar
> http://about.me/stamparm
>

Just a sec. Will do some "adjustments" :)

Bye

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...>
wrote:

> Mysql
> On Sep 28, 2015 3:18 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
>> Which DBMS?
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi miro
>>>
>>> Owh i see..
>>> Ok thanks for the reply
>>>
>>> I'm using time based injection so you can imagine how long it takes for
>>> me to do 113 tables from the start instead of resuming from 105
>>>
>>> Thanks again
>>> On Sep 28, 2015 2:45 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> You haven't told which SQLi technique has been identified by sqlmap
>>>> (e.g. boolean-based blind). Also, has sqlmap extracted those table names by
>>>> common table name search or by regular querying of the system tables (you
>>>> could remember this from first sqlmap's run).
>>>>
>>>> If you are combining --common-tables with regular --tables, especially
>>>> if the sqlmap uses regular querying of system tables, this won't work.
>>>> Thing is that sqlmap doesn't know what is the "first table in database",
>>>> nor "second table in database", nor... All those tables are the same when
>>>> querying from system tables. Also, there can't be one huge "...WHERE
>>>> table_name NOT IN ('...','...'...)" as your request would most probably be
>>>> dropped by the web server (due to its HUGE length).
>>>>
>>>> Bye
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, miro thanks for the reply
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually I already have 105 tables name crack so I use it in common
>>>>> tables.
>>>>> I'm try to run a sqlmap with - - common tables
>>>>>
>>>>> So far it works a sqlmap successfully brute force all the 105 table
>>>>> names
>>>>> But when I try to resume it with --tables it start from 1 again
>>>>>
>>>>> I just thought that if a sqlmap can do start and stop for data
>>>>> extraction why not table names
>>>>> On Sep 27, 2015 9:01 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <
>>>>> mir...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is
>>>>>> erased and overwritten).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bye
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hi guys
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is there a way to resume tables injection
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
>>>>>>> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> sqlmap-users mailing list
>>>>>>> sql...@li...
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Miroslav Stampar
>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>
>

-- 
Miroslav Stampar
http://about.me/stamparm

Hi.

Update to the latest revision and do the following:

.. --tables --limit=105

Bye

p.s. you are lucky that you are using MySQL as this patch is "doable" (as
MySQL uses LIMIT m,n mechanism)
p.p.s.

for example:

A) python sqlmap.py -u "http://testphp.vulnweb.com/artists.php?artist=1"
--technique=B --tables -D acuart

returns

Database: acuart
[8 tables]
+-----------+
| artists   |
| carts     |
| categ     |
| featured  |
| guestbook |
| pictures  |
| products  |
| users     |
+-----------+

while

B) python sqlmap.py -u "http://testphp.vulnweb.com/artists.php?artist=1"
--technique=B --tables -D acuart --start 5

returns

Database: acuart
[4 tables]
+-----------+
| guestbook |
| pictures  |
| products  |
| users     |
+-----------+

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Miroslav Stampar <
mir...@gm...> wrote:

> Just a sec. Will do some "adjustments" :)
>
> Bye
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <net...@gm...
> > wrote:
>
>> Mysql
>> On Sep 28, 2015 3:18 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Which DBMS?
>>>
>>> Bye
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi miro
>>>>
>>>> Owh i see..
>>>> Ok thanks for the reply
>>>>
>>>> I'm using time based injection so you can imagine how long it takes for
>>>> me to do 113 tables from the start instead of resuming from 105
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again
>>>> On Sep 28, 2015 2:45 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>
>>>>> You haven't told which SQLi technique has been identified by sqlmap
>>>>> (e.g. boolean-based blind). Also, has sqlmap extracted those table names by
>>>>> common table name search or by regular querying of the system tables (you
>>>>> could remember this from first sqlmap's run).
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are combining --common-tables with regular --tables, especially
>>>>> if the sqlmap uses regular querying of system tables, this won't work.
>>>>> Thing is that sqlmap doesn't know what is the "first table in database",
>>>>> nor "second table in database", nor... All those tables are the same when
>>>>> querying from system tables. Also, there can't be one huge "...WHERE
>>>>> table_name NOT IN ('...','...'...)" as your request would most probably be
>>>>> dropped by the web server (due to its HUGE length).
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, miro thanks for the reply
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually I already have 105 tables name crack so I use it in common
>>>>>> tables.
>>>>>> I'm try to run a sqlmap with - - common tables
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far it works a sqlmap successfully brute force all the 105 table
>>>>>> names
>>>>>> But when I try to resume it with --tables it start from 1 again
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just thought that if a sqlmap can do start and stop for data
>>>>>> extraction why not table names
>>>>>> On Sep 27, 2015 9:01 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <
>>>>>> mir...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is
>>>>>>> erased and overwritten).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bye
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hi guys
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is there a way to resume tables injection
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
>>>>>>>> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> sqlmap-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> sql...@li...
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Miroslav Stampar
> http://about.me/stamparm
>

-- 
Miroslav Stampar
http://about.me/stamparm

Hohoooo

Cool thanks
On Sep 28, 2015 4:15 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Update to the latest revision and do the following:
>
> .. --tables --limit=105
>
> Bye
>
> p.s. you are lucky that you are using MySQL as this patch is "doable" (as
> MySQL uses LIMIT m,n mechanism)
> p.p.s.
>
> for example:
>
> A) python sqlmap.py -u "http://testphp.vulnweb.com/artists.php?artist=1"
> --technique=B --tables -D acuart
>
> returns
>
> Database: acuart
> [8 tables]
> +-----------+
> | artists   |
> | carts     |
> | categ     |
> | featured  |
> | guestbook |
> | pictures  |
> | products  |
> | users     |
> +-----------+
>
> while
>
> B) python sqlmap.py -u "http://testphp.vulnweb.com/artists.php?artist=1"
> --technique=B --tables -D acuart --start 5
>
> returns
>
> Database: acuart
> [4 tables]
> +-----------+
> | guestbook |
> | pictures  |
> | products  |
> | users     |
> +-----------+
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Miroslav Stampar <
> mir...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> Just a sec. Will do some "adjustments" :)
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>>> Mysql
>>> On Sep 28, 2015 3:18 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which DBMS?
>>>>
>>>> Bye
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi miro
>>>>>
>>>>> Owh i see..
>>>>> Ok thanks for the reply
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using time based injection so you can imagine how long it takes
>>>>> for me to do 113 tables from the start instead of resuming from 105
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again
>>>>> On Sep 28, 2015 2:45 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <
>>>>> mir...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You haven't told which SQLi technique has been identified by sqlmap
>>>>>> (e.g. boolean-based blind). Also, has sqlmap extracted those table names by
>>>>>> common table name search or by regular querying of the system tables (you
>>>>>> could remember this from first sqlmap's run).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are combining --common-tables with regular --tables,
>>>>>> especially if the sqlmap uses regular querying of system tables, this won't
>>>>>> work. Thing is that sqlmap doesn't know what is the "first table in
>>>>>> database", nor "second table in database", nor... All those tables are the
>>>>>> same when querying from system tables. Also, there can't be one huge
>>>>>> "...WHERE table_name NOT IN ('...','...'...)" as your request would most
>>>>>> probably be dropped by the web server (due to its HUGE length).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bye
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi, miro thanks for the reply
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually I already have 105 tables name crack so I use it in common
>>>>>>> tables.
>>>>>>> I'm try to run a sqlmap with - - common tables
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So far it works a sqlmap successfully brute force all the 105 table
>>>>>>> names
>>>>>>> But when I try to resume it with --tables it start from 1 again
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just thought that if a sqlmap can do start and stop for data
>>>>>>> extraction why not table names
>>>>>>> On Sep 27, 2015 9:01 PM, "Miroslav Stampar" <
>>>>>>> mir...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In case of flushing the session, nothing is being left (session is
>>>>>>>> erased and overwritten).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bye
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Indra Zulkarnain <
>>>>>>>> net...@gm...> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> hi guys
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> is there a way to resume tables injection
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i already have 105 tables but then i flush the session
>>>>>>>>> how do i start from 105 to 113 tables
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> sqlmap-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> sql...@li...
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>>>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Miroslav Stampar
>>>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Miroslav Stampar
>> http://about.me/stamparm
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Miroslav Stampar
> http://about.me/stamparm
>