Thread: Re: [sqlmap-users] Fail when trying to perform a checkout from sqlmap trunk
Brought to you by:
inquisb
From: Ryan S. <rd...@mt...> - 2011-04-17 19:51:57
|
Wait, what? Are they *really* signed by a trusted CA? I was going to suggest getting one from GoDaddy (http://www.godaddy.com/Compare/gdcompare_ssl.aspx?isc=sslqgo026e). Hell I'll even pay for it myself, anything I can do to support you guys! Maybe we should go with comodo? :-P Ryan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Pinkham" <ste...@gm...> To: "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...> Cc: "sqlmap users" <sql...@li...> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 2:15:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [sqlmap-users] Fail when trying to perform a checkout from sqlmap trunk Miroslav Stampar wrote: > hi. > > what are the suggestions for getting real certificate (not self-signed)? > > kr > Basic startcom SSL certs are free. They are supported by all major browsers and operating systems, and are verified as poorly^W well as any other SSL cert. http://cert.startcom.org/ -- | Steven Pinkham, Security Consultant | | http://www.mavensecurity.com | | GPG public key ID CD31CAFB | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ sqlmap-users mailing list sql...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users |
From: Steven P. <ste...@gm...> - 2011-04-17 22:32:31
|
Ryan Sears wrote: > Wait, what? Are they *really* signed by a trusted CA? Yup. Startcom was added to the windows root certificate program in September 2009. They were already in Firefox and Safari at that time. It work just fine everywhere, as long as you correctly install the intermediate certs according to the instructions, much like you need to do for a godaddy or other cert these days. http://www.startssl.com/?app=25#31 They allow one alt name of your choosing. Authentication is handled with client side certs. They do basic fraud avoidance like flagging people who ask for, say, usbank.example.com as their alt name(I've tried ;-) As far as I can tell there is absolutely no upside to paying for some other Class 1 (domain/email validated) cert over the startcom free cert. Of course, if you need a wildcard cert, class 2 cert with business verification(so your name shows up when smart users hover over the lock icon), or extended validation cert(so the bar turns green), you still have to pony up. Otherwise, class 1 certs are common and trusted on the Internet. Most people don't know or care about the differences of the different classes. #1 reason to not use SSL is gone. Spread the word. ;-) > I was going to suggest getting one from GoDaddy (http://www.godaddy.com/Compare/gdcompare_ssl.aspx?isc=sslqgo026e). Hell I'll even pay for it myself, anything I can do to support you guys! > > Maybe we should go with comodo? :-P > > Ryan > -- | Steven Pinkham, Security Consultant | | http://www.mavensecurity.com | | GPG public key ID CD31CAFB | |
From: Bernardo D. A. G. <ber...@gm...> - 2011-04-19 06:30:34
|
Thanks for the info Steve. We will consider a valid cert for svn.sqlmap.org. Bernardo Damele A. G. This message was sent from a smartphone On 17 Apr 2011, at 23:33, Steven Pinkham <ste...@gm...> wrote: > Ryan Sears wrote: >> Wait, what? Are they *really* signed by a trusted CA? > > Yup. Startcom was added to the windows root certificate program in > September 2009. They were already in Firefox and Safari at that time. > > It work just fine everywhere, as long as you correctly install the > intermediate certs according to the instructions, much like you need to > do for a godaddy or other cert these days. > > http://www.startssl.com/?app=25#31 > > They allow one alt name of your choosing. Authentication is handled with > client side certs. They do basic fraud avoidance like flagging people > who ask for, say, usbank.example.com as their alt name(I've tried ;-) > > As far as I can tell there is absolutely no upside to paying for some > other Class 1 (domain/email validated) cert over the startcom free cert. > Of course, if you need a wildcard cert, class 2 cert with business > verification(so your name shows up when smart users hover over the lock > icon), or extended validation cert(so the bar turns green), you still > have to pony up. Otherwise, class 1 certs are common and trusted on the > Internet. Most people don't know or care about the differences of the > different classes. > > #1 reason to not use SSL is gone. Spread the word. ;-) > >> I was going to suggest getting one from GoDaddy (http://www.godaddy.com/Compare/gdcompare_ssl.aspx?isc=sslqgo026e). Hell I'll even pay for it myself, anything I can do to support you guys! >> >> Maybe we should go with comodo? :-P >> >> Ryan >> > > > -- > | Steven Pinkham, Security Consultant | > | http://www.mavensecurity.com | > | GPG public key ID CD31CAFB | > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > sqlmap-users mailing list > sql...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users |