Re: [sqlmap-users] Back-end DBMS charset encoding
Brought to you by:
inquisb
From: mitchell <mit...@tu...> - 2011-01-18 11:27:57
|
Hi Miroslav, In say 80% of the cases I delt with Bulgarian sites, the data in the database used the same encoding as the encoding announced on the webpage, usually CP-1251. The rest use UTF. # mitchell On 17 Jan 2011 16:52, "Miroslav Stampar" <mir...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all. > > I have a general question to all those pentesters that are retrieving data > from sites with "funny" charset encodings (...russian, chinese...). > > What's should be the general "consensus" for data retrieval: > > A) assume that the backend DBMS uses the "utf8" charset encoding > or > B) treat data retrieved with the same encoding as used in the page > or > C) find out the proper collation used and use that one? (i am not a fan of > this one :) > or > D) don't care (some people tend to use mixed collations which is quite > romantic) > > Also, I would like to ask you all to try out the latest revision with cases > that could be problematic and report impressions. > > Kind regards |