From: <as...@ko...> - 2007-08-11 10:56:47
|
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:48:04 +0200, Lionel wrote: > So this leak seemed to be in the InactiveDestroy handling of recent DBI > or DBD-*. There was recently a nice description of how to handle $dbh, forking and InactiveDestroy over on the DBD::Pg mailinglist: <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.dbdpg/2276> Best regards, Adam -- "Be?" Adam Sjøgren "Be. Be period. Is." as...@ko... |