Re: [Sqlgrey-users] Stable tree or experimental?

[Lionel B. <lio...@bo...>]

McDonald, Dan wrote the following on 24.05.2007 22:01 :
>
> I've been running sqlgrey 1.6.6 for a while, and am comfortable with how
> it works.  One of my spam-tossers lost a disk, and I am rebuilding the
> system from scratch (It's been in operation basically unchanged for a
> year - with this sort of application it's good to get a nice clean slate
> now and again). Should I stick with 1.6.6 or go with the latest
> experimental release? (1.7.5?)
>

Currently the experimental has one less known bug than the stable (if
syslog dies, SQLgrey can die too).

Lionel