Re: [Sqlgrey-users] multiple read/write database support patch

[Paul B. H. <he...@ac...>]

On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Lionel Bouton wrote:

> I'm willing to test the patch, but I'd prefer to get one done against CVS
> if possible or at least in unified diff format to make it easier to
> integrate (the db_unavailable alone would be easy to handle but there is
> a piece of code in the rest of the patch I'm not yet very familiar with).

New patch in unified format attached... One minor change, my initial patch
resulted in the first connection being to the second server listed in the
configuration, which was nonintuitive. This patch connects to the first
listed server first.

Dan mentioned possibly changing the semantics of the existing db_host to
provide this functionality, which seemed to make sense, but would take a
bit more work to refactor all of the code currently depending on it.

Thanks...


-- 
Paul B. Henson  |  (909) 979-6361  |  http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst  |  he...@cs...
California State Polytechnic University  |  Pomona CA 91768