|
From: Lionel B. <lio...@bo...> - 2007-01-19 19:26:09
|
Micha Silver wrote the following on 19.01.2007 19:58 : > Lionel Bouton wrote: > > >> Micha Silver wrote the following on 19.01.2007 19:25 : >> >> >>> Where can I see more details on this 1.7.4 version, and the >>> "discrimination" feature? >>> We've been using greylisting for several months, and while spam has >>> indeed decreased dramatically, we have to spend time every day or two >>> adding new entries to the client_fqdn_addr.local file because of false >>> postivies. I think the problem is mostly mail servers that resend almost >>> immediately and get marked as spam. >>> >>> >>> >> What do you mean by "marked as spam"? mails should either be rejected or >> received in the end never "marked as spam" (at least by SQLgrey). >> >> > Sorry. I meant rejected. > >> If you need to add entries to client_fqdn_addr.local in order to receive >> mail from them, I'd like to know them. >> >> >> > Here's the current list: > http://www.arava.co.il/~micha/clients_fqdn_whitelist.local > They're mostly domains hosted here in Israel. > I've seen many entries that should work without whitelisting them. microsoft.com, yahoo.com, wanadoo.fr, gmail.com at least work on my servers and they are others so big that I doubt other SQLgrey users never had mail from them. Did you setup SQLgrey with a low max_connect_age, the default is 24 (24 hours)? It could explain so many false positives. Lionel |