Re: [Sqlgrey-users] couple new user questions

[Philippe C. <sql...@pa...>]

On 6/27/2016 10:49 AM, Lionel Bouton wrote:
>> # Small L.A. Law Firm
>> assantilaw.com
>> *.assantilaw.com
>
> For this and the following entries, is the domain name really the fqdn
> of one of the sources ?
> I ask because the less entries we add, the less CPU we use. So if none
> of their servers resolves to "assantilaw.com" this is superfluous.

	I don't remember, but their MX records are now googlemail.com, so I'm 
betting they've switched away from whatever homegrown, non-compliant 
setup they were using when this was an issues several years ago.  I'd 
now say, 100% ignore this one.

				-- Philippe Chaintreuil