From: Karl O. P. <ko...@me...> - 2015-08-12 00:03:24
|
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:28:30 +0200 Lionel Bouton <lio...@bo...> wrote: > Le 11/08/2015 22:26, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit : > > There might be modifications needed to stand "huge" loads under > > PostgreSQL. For example, I think of as much as 10.000 queries per > > second. This does not happen very often, I agree. > > In theory you should be able to reach these levels with PostgreSQL > easily even with write-intensive situations like SPAM storms if you > use enterprise level SSD to store your database. I've not tested > SQLgrey itself at these levels though (you may need to distribute the > workload on multiple instances). You could always throw hardware at it. The latest Postgres (at least) has multi-master capability. Karl <ko...@me...> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein |