From: Bruce B. <bb...@bo...> - 2015-07-03 22:21:20
|
Thanks for your feedback Karl, Dan, and Lionel.. On 7/3/15 12:33 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:13:03 -0500 > Bruce Bodger <bb...@bo...> wrote: > >> I'm wondering how many of you have implemented the sqlgrey mod >> described here... http://www.hyllander.org/sqlgrey_whitelisting > Some thoughts, take them for what you will: > > If it were me I'd avoid modifying sqlgrey and write a little > postfix filter that frobs the database whitelist directly. > I'm no advocate of re-inventing the wheel, and honestly > didn't read the article in detail, but simpler seems better > than more complicated. > I understand your perspectives. I've been running sqlgrey since 2009. I was just wondering if you saw this issue as a big deal and, obviously, you don't. As soon as I hear from a recipient having any problem sending us email I check the mail log and then add their domain to clients_fqdn_whitelist.local if I see that they've truly connected. Again, thanks for the replies. BTW, I've kept the reject_code = 451 default since original installation. P.S. Even though I've been running sqlgrey for 6 years I've never been sure what the whitelist requires. Is troubled.com equivalent to *.troubled.com? My intention is to add all servers and users in the troubled.com domain. I've been adding both. Thanks again, Bruce |