| 
      
      
      From: Lionel B. <lio...@bo...> - 2005-08-15 12:42:42
      
     | 
| Sascha Lucas wrote the following on 15.08.2005 10:27 : >> Ok, adding only the first header would indeed being meaningful in the >> example above. I was thinking of the future evolutions of SQLgrey and >> didn't explained myself well. >> >> The above works only because we don't use AWLs based on recipients... >> *yet*. In the future, SQLgrey will have an intermediate connect_awl >> table (with src, sender and recipient) and a rcpt_awl (with only src, >> recipients) in addition > > > Ok. Thats what I didn't know :-). > > Lionel: Thanks a lot for your long explanation. Can you tell me > roughly when SQLgrey will have rcpt_awl? > Depends on my free time... There's a lot to do in the 1.7.x branch and I may very well start by splitting the code into more manageable modules which will delay new functionnalities but then speed the development. > BTW: I just want to say that I (and many mail-users) are happy with > sqlgrey. > Knowing that people benefit from my work is a good motivation for me :-) Thanks! Lionel. |