| 
      
      
      From: Sascha L. <sas...@ru...> - 2005-08-15 08:27:33
      
     | 
| > Ok, adding only the first header would indeed being meaningful in the example > above. I was thinking of the future evolutions of SQLgrey and didn't > explained myself well. > > The above works only because we don't use AWLs based on recipients... *yet*. > In the future, SQLgrey will have an intermediate connect_awl table (with src, > sender and recipient) and a rcpt_awl (with only src, recipients) in addition Ok. Thats what I didn't know :-). Lionel: Thanks a lot for your long explanation. Can you tell me roughly when SQLgrey will have rcpt_awl? BTW: I just want to say that I (and many mail-users) are happy with sqlgrey. Thanks, Sascha. |