|
From: Sascha L. <sas...@ru...> - 2005-08-12 15:13:56
|
> There's a problem with that: nothing prevents two recipients for the same > message from being treated differently (one can match a connect entry and the > following matches the AWL entry just created: two different headers). The > problem is that we don't add the header on delivery but way before that. We > have no way of adding a header per RCPT TO: this is a limitation of the > policy protocol. We could have more meaningful headers with the "RCPT TO" > listed for each header but I'm afraid it's the best we can do. I dont understand. If the 1st RCPT matches the connect entry and it is an "reconnect ok", then you add the X-Greylist: delayed ... header. The other RCPTs would result in a match of the from_awl table which would result in a X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted ... header. But you know this instance=... allready gots it's header so sqlgrey don't say action=PREPEND.... Please tell me what point I misunderstand. Thanks, Sascha. |