Re: [Sqlgrey-users] warn_if_reject to populate the db

[Who K. <qui...@me...>]

Michael Storz wrote:

>On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Michel Bouissou wrote:
>
> =20
>
>>Le Mardi 28 Juin 2005 16:05, Lionel Bouton a =E9crit :
>>   =20
>>
>>>This is why I added a reference to SPF in my TODO
>>>     =20
>>>
>>And if you add SPF, then tomorrow you'll have to consider adding M$
>>CallerID/SenderID as well, and then Yahoo! DomainKeys, then SRS validit=
y
>>check, then the same for SES, then for BATV, then for the new algorithm=
 of
>>the day ;-)
>>
>>
>>   =20
>>
>
>If these additions will strengthen the greylisting process, then they
>should be implemented.
>
> =20
>
Okay, here is my $0.02. They DO NOT strengthen the greylisting process=20
as they have
nothing to do with greylisting. They are simply other methods for=20
combatting SPAM.

Any utility that attempts to be the omnicient "do all" ultimately fails.=20
Therefore
my vote is that SQLgrey should do what is does best... greylisting.

Jim