Re: [Sqlgrey-users] warn_if_reject to populate the db

[Michel B. <mi...@bo...>]

Le Mardi 28 Juin 2005 16:45, Lionel Bouton a =E9crit :
>
> >Yes, it can be useful in this way _only_ with a manual whitelist. But =
why
> >bother, as the greylisting system will create its AWL automatically wi=
th
> > much less effort than having to maintain a manual WL ?
>
> The whitelist could be dynamically loaded from a central repository...

I don't like that much this central repository thing. The nice thing with=
=20
greylisting is that it is a purely dynamic system that doesn't need any=20
external output, and doesn't need to rely on other people's appreciation=20
(what you do when you use RBLs...)

SQLgrey currently has a central repository only for the whitelists that a=
re=20
"exceptions that don't work with greylisting", so this is understandable,=
 and=20
for the regexps, that haven't changed at all so far, and that are expecte=
d to=20
change very little (maybe once in the future if the .res. thing proves=20
useful ?)

Even now, people have no obligation to use the auto-update script, so sql=
grey=20
can continue to be used purely locally at the admin choice.

--=20
Michel Bouissou <mi...@bo...> OpenPGP ID 0xDDE8AC6E