|
From: Klaus A. S. <kse...@gm...> - 2005-06-08 08:32:09
|
Lionel Bouton wrote: >>> 64.233.183 in clients_ip_whitelist.local (google registered 64.233.160.= 0/19 >>> anyway) >>=20 >> Rather 64.233.182. 64.233.183 is covered by the >> /^[mnrwz]proxy\.gmail\com$/ regexp, at least as of now, but I get >> your point. > =20 > Unless the DNS is answering differently to me (could be), > nproxy.gmail.com does only cover 64.233.182.x addresses. >=20 > The fqdn Postfix hands to SQLgrey is the result of a double query: first > a PTR query to get the fqdn (both 62.233.182.... and 64.233.183.... > points to nproxy.gmail.com) then it queries the fqdn to check that the > fqdn covers the original IP to be sure that it isn't a simple trick : > this is were 64.233.183 isn't found and Postfix considers the address > unknown. >=20 > So /^[mnrwz]proxy\.gmail\com$/ can only match the systems on 62.233.182.x >=20 > Am I mistaken? No, not anymore. ;-) When I sent my original email DNS listed nproxy as 64.233.183.192-207, but hosts HELOing as nproxy came from address in 62.233.182.x. Now it seems DNS has been corrected so that nproxy has the IP addresses 64.233.182.192-207. Case solved, I guess. It must have been a typo in the Gmail zone file. Cheers, --=20 Klaus Alexander Seistrup Magnetic Ink =B7 Copenhagen =B7 Denmark http://magnetic-ink.dk/ |