Re: [Sqlgrey-users] Possible bug in sqlgrey ?

[Michel B. <mi...@bo...>]

Le Dimanche 24 Avril 2005 22:05, Lionel Bouton a =E9crit :
>
> >I have the impression that with such "+"ed addresses, for some reason,=
 the
> >from_awl "sender_domain" gets the sending server name FQDN instead of
> > getting the sender's domain alone.
>
> I've looked at the code and AFAIKT nowhere are the $fqdn and
> $sender_domain mixed up. What could happen is that some misconfigured
> server could change the MAIL FROM: on retries. This could explain what
> you are witnessing. Could you have a look into Postfix's logs?

I've checked both my Postfix logs (quickly, I didn't have much time) and =
the=20
code, and so far I don't understand clearly what happens on this respect.=
 It=20
is quite possible that I have reported a non-existing problem ;-) but my=20
server being only secondary on the concerned receiving domain, I have to =
take=20
a look at what happens at the primary itself.
Anyway, as the primary also uses SQLgrey, the concerned ML addresses shou=
ld=20
already be whitelisted by SQLgrey at the primary, so I shouldn't get all=20
these connections and greylist them. There's something puzzling me there.

> If it's the case, this would be a good candidate to the whitelists...

This concerns all of the "gentoo" mailing-lists, coming from server=20
lists.gentoo.org[140.105.134.102]...

Cheers.

--=20
Michel Bouissou <mi...@bo...> OpenPGP ID 0xDDE8AC6E
Appel de 200 Informaticiens pour le NON au Trait=E9 Constitutionnel
Europ=E9en: http://www.200informaticiens.ras.eu.org