Re: [Sqlgrey-users] (Another) possible bug in sqlgrey ?

[Michel B. <mi...@bo...>]

Le Dimanche 24 Avril 2005 22:05, Lionel Bouton a =E9crit :
>
> BTW, I just found out that we were matching "SRS" in the
> normalize_sender, but it is called after lowercasing the whole string..=
.
> I've neither seen an SRS email, but I think the current code doesn't
> match. I lowercased the corresponding regexp in my tree.

If you wish, I can create an alias for you at my domain, that would be=20
forwarded and SRS'd to any address of your choice. Email forwarded thru t=
his=20
alias would be SRS'd, so you could check how it looks like by yourself.
Please tell me by private mail if you would be interested.

> >The original corresponding "true" sender localpart for this example wa=
s
> > (case respected):
> >
> >bounce-439452-5541B8D889BBAF2DE05C02B4A0AF204F93174A98-439250@...
>
> I'm adding a while loop to call the regexp until the string doesn't
> change anymore, this should strip each hex sequence one by one. I'm
> looking at the s/orig/dest/g syntax to see the problem (might come from
> variable usage in dest: $1#$2).

I believe that you are correct.

Cheers.

--=20
Michel Bouissou <mi...@bo...> OpenPGP ID 0xDDE8AC6E
Appel de 200 Informaticiens pour le NON au Trait=E9 Constitutionnel
Europ=E9en: http://www.200informaticiens.ras.eu.org