[Sqlgrey-users] Possible bug in sqlgrey ?

[Michel B. <mi...@bo...>]

Hi there,

I've been wondering for some time if there couldn't be a bug in sqlgrey f=
or=20
"plussed" extension source addresses.

These last days, I see very often VERP addresses from a ML, in a format s=
uch=20
as:

list-name+bounces-123-destination.user=3Dd...@li...=
g

getting greylisted everytime by SQLgrey (and entered in the connect table=
),=20
where I see that the from_awl table actually already contains an entry su=
ch=20
as:

sender_name =3D list-name
sender_domain =3D server.listdomain.org

And this entry gets updated when the mail finally makes it thru.

I have the impression that with such "+"ed addresses, for some reason, th=
e=20
from_awl "sender_domain" gets the sending server name FQDN instead of get=
ting=20
the sender's domain alone.

The connect table, OTOH, seems to get the correct complete sender address=
=20
localpart, and sender domain

I'm not completely sure about this, but I found this weird enough to post=
 this=20
report ;-)

Cheers.

--=20
Michel Bouissou <mi...@bo...> OpenPGP ID 0xDDE8AC6E
Appel de 200 Informaticiens pour le NON au Trait=E9 Constitutionnel
Europ=E9en: http://www.200informaticiens.ras.eu.org