Re: [Sqlgrey-users] Re: Is clients_fqdn_whitelist.local still being used?

[Klaus A. S. <kse...@gm...>]

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:47:08 +0100, Lionel Bouton
<lio...@bo...> wrote:

>>> /^(mail|mx0|pop|imap)\.gmx\.(de|net|co\.uk)$/
>>> /^[mrw]proxy\.gmail\.com$/
>>>
>>> are being ignored, too...
>=20
> Just tested with 1.5.3. WORKSFORME(tm).
>=20
> When SQLgrey detects a change in the local file it logs a reload like
> this (even with 'quiet'):
> Mar 14 22:33:38 ns sqlgrey: reloading
> /etc/sqlgrey/clients_fqdn_whitelist.local
> just add a blank line somewhere and wait for an SMTP connexion...
>=20
> If it doesn't log a line like this, here's what could have happened:

The files get reloaded, but SQLgrey doesn't take into account the
clients_fqdn_whitelist.local file.  The clients_fqdn_whitelist.local
is being used, though.  This is what it looked like a few minutes ago
when I touched the two *.local files:

<snip>
reloading /etc/sqlgrey/clients_ip_whitelist.local
reloading /etc/sqlgrey/clients_fqdn_whitelist.local
domain_awl-match: updating gmx.co.uk, 213.165.64
from_awl-match: updating 64.233.184: x@y.z
whitelist: a@b.c, 81.7.132.92(linuxnews.dk) d@e.f
</snip>

> Probable solution: restart SQLgrey and don't handle these files on
> systems in the future, past or an alternate dimension.

My mailbox is running NTP and file times look sane:

<snip>
$ stat *.local
  File: `clients_fqdn_whitelist.local'
  Size: 1616            Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: 2101h/8449d     Inode: 897494      Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Access: 2005-03-14 23:16:03.000882252 +0100
Modify: 2005-03-14 23:12:02.050540707 +0100
Change: 2005-03-14 23:12:02.050540707 +0100
  File: `clients_ip_whitelist.local'
  Size: 683             Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: 2101h/8449d     Inode: 897588      Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Access: 2005-03-14 23:16:02.996882861 +0100
Modify: 2005-03-14 23:12:02.050540707 +0100
Change: 2005-03-14 23:12:02.050540707 +0100
$=20
</snip>

Is there any way (perhaps a perl switch, or something) to check if the
regexps used in the two files are all valid?

Or is the only other solution to upgrade to v1.5.3?

Cheers,

--=20
Klaus Alexander Seistrup
SubZeroNet =B7 Copenhagen =B7 Denmark