Re: [Sqlgrey-users] SQLgrey and IPv6

[Klaus A. S. <kse...@gm...>]

On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:39:58 +0100, Lionel Bouton
<lio...@bo...> wrote:

>> I'm not sure.  Many tunnel brokers hand out /64 or /48 nets to end
>> users.  E.g., I have [2001:1448:89::]/48 from ngdc.dk.  My impression
>> is that IPv6/64 is somewhat similar to IPv4/32 (I'm not sure if
>> IPv6/48 should be compared to IPv4/24, though). but that is highly
>> subjective.
>=20
> I'm not sure IPv6/64 is the same as IPv4/32, I'll ask around as I know
> some ADSL users with IPv6 connectivity.

I didn't mean functionally equal to.  What I meant was that an IPv6/64
seems to have the same "value" ("value" as in "exchange rate") as an
IPv4/32.

> One more thing: I need to know who will be able to test IPv6 support
> (I'm not able to). For testing, you'll need at least a Postfix 2.2
> pre-release (not a Postfix with an unofficial IPv6 patch...) or 2.2.x
> when it's out and some IPv6 SMTP trafic.

I see that Wietse has just announced Postfix 2.2, so it might not take
long before I'm able to do testing with a genuine Postfix 2.2 and
IPv6.  However, Wietse writes in his announcement that the IPv6
support is from third party patches, so chances are the tests will
look the same with my Postfix 2.1.5 with Debian patches.

Cheers,

--=20
Klaus Alexander Seistrup
SubZeroNet =B7 Copenhagen =B7 Denmark